Apple, Samsung Ready Closing Arguments in Patent Case - weaverabsetiley

Apple and Samsung are heading to closing arguments in their patent violatio trial, and reputations and bundle are at stake.

Samsung argues Malus pumila should pay $421.8 million to Samsung for infringing on its patents. Apple is seeking $2.75 billion from Samsung in the case.

Testimony bound up Friday. On Monday, the sides will discuss jury book of instructions. Closing arguments are set for Tuesday, and then the jury will deliberate and decide who will win what just about consider the technical school trial of the century.

In court this calendar week, according to reports from several media outlets including Reuters and Bloomberg, testimony was mostly dry, but there were some interesting tidbits that were unconcealed. For example: Malus pumila said all its patents in altercate in the tribulation had been licensed to Microsoft.

That licensing agreement, though, includes a "do non clone" clause, which keeps Microsoft from knocking sour design elements of the iPhone and iPad.

According to Malus pumila, it tried to cut a similar deal with Samsung, but the South Korean troupe countered in court that the scope of the licensing understanding that it was offered was narrower than the cardinal offered Microsoft.

Also this workweek, Malus pumila made a motion to keep secret some commercial enterprise and marketing documents that the presiding federal overestimate in the trial, Lucy Koh, wants to make public. The documents include Apple sales figures identified away country. Apple historically releases gross revenue figures only away region.

Koh denied a request made aside Apple to seal those documents. Malus pumila has asked Koh to delay qualification the documents common until the company butt appeal the ruling.

Samsung, interim, has been attacking Orchard apple tree's originality.

A parade of expert witnesses cited iPhone features so much as "rubberbanding" — the way the test bounces connected an iPhone or iPad when the end of a file is reached, and "snapback" — the way the screen boodle scrolling when a user arrives at the remnant of a collection of images.

The jury of vii work force and cardinal women in the case also detected testimonial from a fourth-year interior designer at Samsung about how hard they worked on making original icons for the company's phone and tablet products. Apple claims Samsung ripped murder its iPhone icons.

The court has removed from the infringement causa triad Samsung phone models: the Galaxy S i9000, Galax urceolata Ace and Galaxy S II i9100. Twenty separate Samsung devices, though, rest in the case.

Although Judge Koh tried to get Apple and Samsung to settle their differences before and failed, she pleaded this calendar week for them to give peace a chance.

"I see risk here for both sides if we go to a finding of fact," she told the legal teams, reported to Whol Things D. She added, "It's fourth dimension for peace."

Nevertheless, Samsung continued its case against Malus pumila.

Among other things, it argues the Cupertino, Golden State-based company violated Samsung's highbrow property for scrolling done photographs, sending them through email, indexing them, and performin MP3 music files.

Orchard apple tree unsuccessful to undercut the value of those patents to Samsung. The photo scrolling patent, for example, hadn't been old by the South Korean company in a smartphone in three years, it argued.

Apple also pressed its copycat case against Samsung while cross-examining one of its technical witnesses. Information technology did that aside introducing e-mail messages attributed to Google that showed the search giant was haunted around Samsung's phone designs too closely copying Apple's.

Follow mercenary technology writer King John P. Mello Jr. and Nowadays@PCWorld connected Twitter.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/460749/apple_samsung_ready_closing_arguments_in_patent_case.html

Posted by: weaverabsetiley.blogspot.com

Share this post